The controversy between Pamela Lopezstill wife of Christian Cuevaand the singer Pamela Franco It lights up again after the cumbiambera offered an interview on Verónica Linares’ podcast, where she assured that she regrets having sworn by her daughter by denying that she knew the soccer player.
Far from turning the page, Lopez She reacted firmly and made it clear that, for her, Franco’s version is still full of contradictions and a visible attempt to “accommodate” history. The woman from Trujillo maintains that the interpreter has only deepened her confusion because “she cannot support valid arguments to cover up a lie.”
Pamela’s response was immediate and forceful. For her, the artist continues to manage a doublespeaktrying to justify himself to public opinion without facing what, he claims, really happened. López recalled that, when he called her to confront her, Franco swore on his daughter that he did not know Cavesomething that today the singer recognizes as a mistake. That moment, for the woman from Trujillo, was definitive:
“She did swear by her daughter. For me, my children are sacred. It has no brain, it has no heart”, he expressed indignation to Magaly TV La Firme.
The footballer’s still wife also made reference to an episode that marked the beginning of her suspicions: the deposit of 280 soles made by Cueva a Franco. Faced with this banking operation, Pamela López decided to seek answers directly. She recalled that one morning he called her to ask why her husband had sent her money and if there was a “clandestine relationship” between both of them.
“I kicked him out like a dog from my house and I kept his cell phone. When I start investigating to have a little more clarity, I write her a WhatsApp and that’s when I call her. She didn’t expect it to be my voice,” he told the cameras. Magaly TV La Firme.
Lopez He assures that that call revealed much more than Franco has wanted to publicly acknowledge. While the singer has declared that she had no communication with Cueva for years, the woman from Trujillo affirms that what happened that morning completely refutes that version.
For her, Franco’s attempt to rewrite what happened only shows an intention to cleanse himself before the public, but without assuming the weight of his decisions. In that context, Pamela López did not hesitate to make a comment full of irony towards the singer: “For me you are the loverthe official clandestine. Cool, you earned the Tinka! “In a few years we will see who won.”
The statements, far from being a simple impulsive reaction, reveal the deep pain and emotional exhaustion that López claims to have faced while seeking to understand the situation with her husband. He expressed that, when he discovered suspicious messages and behavior, his objective was not to humiliate anyone, but to seek clarity to protect his family. However, he admits that, from his perspective, Franco did not act sincerely from the first moment.
Lopez He also insisted that Franco’s interview with Linares only further exposes the inconsistencies that, he claims, have always surrounded the story. For the woman from Trujillo, the singer tries to present herself as a victim of attacks or unfair interpretations, when in reality—as she says—she would have had an active role in a situation that directly affected her marriage. Furthermore, the way in which Franco approached the issue of the oath for his daughter was especially criticized, since López believes that such a delicate issue cannot be used as a shield or minimized later.
Meanwhile, Pamela Franco has not spoken again after López’s response, but her interview has already generated multiple interpretations and reactions on social networks. The issue continues to divide opinions and once again place both women at the center of a conflict that, apparently, still has several layers to reveal.
