The controversial election of the questioned new president José María Balcázar was criticized by the head of Congress, Fernando Rospigliosi, who harshly questioned the legislators who supported the decision, pointing out that the process was marked by political mistakes and lack of foresight. During his public statements, the official expressed his discomfort with the result and the way in which the vote was conducted.
According to information released by SuccessfulRospigliosi maintained that the situation was foreseeable and that prior warnings had been made. “Evidently, they have committed a very serious mistake. An error that was repeatedly warned. “I have said it myself many times,” he stated. The head of Parliament insisted that the current scenario responds to decisions made without fully evaluating their political and institutional consequences.
In the same context, the Congressman Carlos Zeballos He pointed out that the result was achieved mainly with votes from the political center, and assured that not all parliamentary benches They uniformly backed the winning candidate. His statements reflected internal divisions within the Legislature and showed that the vote did not have full consensus among the different parliamentary blocs.
The parliamentarian also indicated that the election between María del Carmen Alva and Balcázar was going to generate criticism regardless of the final result. This appreciation reinforced the idea of a process marked by political tensions previous discussions and strategic disagreements between the groups represented in the chamber.
Rospigliosi emphatically questioned the decision to previously dismiss José Jerí, pointing out that the procedure adopted was not appropriate. “It was absolutely irregular to try to censure President José Jerí when the only constitutional path was a vacancy,” he declared. In his opinion, the measure represented an unnecessary institutional risk and opened an uncertain scenario within the political system.
The president of Congress added that the problem was not only legal, but also political. “They were so clumsy that they didn’t prepare what they wanted. They themselves launched a candidate to replace Jerí. And did they perhaps make the alliances, the consensus necessary to be able to elect that person?”, he questioned. According to him, the lack of coordination between the benches showed improvisation and weakened the parliamentary strategy.
The head of the Legislature warned that the situation could have effects on the institutional stability of the country. “They dismissed Jerí without knowing what was coming. And now we have the consequences. “The irresponsibility with which this situation has been handled is truly incredible,” he said. In his evaluation, the outcome reflects decisions made without prior planning or agreements.
Rospigliosi warned that the current political context requires special vigilance, especially in the face of a fragmented electoral scenario in Peru. “Today all Peruvians are going to pay the cost of this irresponsibility,” he stated, emphasizing that the crisis does not correspond to everyone. Parliamentbut to certain groups that promoted the questioned actions. With this, he raised a warning about the political repercussions that could arise from the recent legislative vote.
