<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Oz Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ozpolitics.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ozpolitics.info</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Electoral demography</title>
		<link>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/12/04/electoral-demography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/12/04/electoral-demography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozpolitics.info/?p=1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  I received a nice email from the ABS &#8230;

I draw your attention to yesterday&#8217;s release by the Australian Bureau of Statistics of Australian Demographic Statistics, June Quarter 2008 (cat. no. 3101.0) and specifically the section at the end of the Main Features on Statistics for Parliamentary Representation.
The release can be found on the ABS [...] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I received a nice email from the ABS &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
I draw your attention to yesterday&#8217;s release by the Australian Bureau of Statistics of Australian Demographic Statistics, June Quarter 2008 (cat. no. 3101.0) and specifically the section at the end of the Main Features on Statistics for Parliamentary Representation.</p>
<p>The release can be found on the ABS website via this link: <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3101.0?OpenDocument">http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3101.0?OpenDocument</a></p>
<p>The relevant section is on page 10 of the PDF file of the publication, or at the end of the &#8220;Summary Commentary&#8221; page on the website.</p>
<p>This updates information published in Information Paper: <em><a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/PrimaryMainFeatures/3107.0.55.002?OpenDocument">Determining Seats in the House of Representatives - Legislative Requirements for Provision of ABS Statistics, Australia, 2005 (cat. no. 3107.0.55.002)</a></em>.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Sometime today I will do the math to see if and where we might be losing or gaining seats for the next election.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: Antony has done <a href="http://blogs.abc.net.au/antonygreen/2008/12/nsw-and-queensl.html">the hard work</a> for me &#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>
New South Wales - 48 seats, down from the current 49</p>
<p>Victoria - 37 seats, unchanged</p>
<p>Queensland - 30 seats, up one from current 29</p>
<p>Western Australia - 15 seats, unchanged</p>
<p>South Australia - 11 seats, unchanged</p>
<p>Tasmania - 5 seats unchanged.</p>
<p>ACT - 2 seats, unchanged</p>
<p>NT - 2 seats, unchanged
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/12/04/electoral-demography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACNielsen and Galaxy: 55 to 45 in Labor&#8217;s favour</title>
		<link>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/17/acnielsen-and-galaxy-55-to-45-in-labors-favour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/17/acnielsen-and-galaxy-55-to-45-in-labors-favour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Galaxy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozpolitics.info/?p=1200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Galaxy: here and here.
ACNielsen: here and here.
Graphs here.
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Galaxy: <a href="http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24660650-5005941,00.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/files/polltables.doc">here</a>.</p>
<p>ACNielsen: <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/get-it-right-or-else-rudd-warns-20081116-683y.html?page=-1">here</a> and <a href="http://news.smh.com.au/national/poll-shows-rudd-labor-are-more-popular-20081117-687j.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>Graphs <a href="http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/elections/fed2010/the-polls/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/17/acnielsen-and-galaxy-55-to-45-in-labors-favour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan: 58.5 to 41.5 in Labor&#8217;s favour</title>
		<link>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/15/morgan-585-to-415-in-labors-favour-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/15/morgan-585-to-415-in-labors-favour-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozpolitics.info/?p=1189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Report here.
Graphs here.
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Report <a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2008/4336/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Graphs <a href="http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/elections/fed2010/the-polls/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/15/morgan-585-to-415-in-labors-favour-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 55 to 45 in Labor&#8217;s favour</title>
		<link>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/11/newspoll-55-to-45-in-labors-favour-6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/11/newspoll-55-to-45-in-labors-favour-6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozpolitics.info/?p=1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Data here
Report here
Graphs here
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Data <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/newspoll11nov.pdf">here</a></p>
<p>Report <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24633228-601,00.html">here</a></p>
<p>Graphs <a href="http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/elections/fed2010/the-polls/">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/11/11/newspoll-55-to-45-in-labors-favour-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan: 56.5 to 43.5 in Labor&#8217;s favour</title>
		<link>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/31/morgan-565-to-435-in-labors-favour-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/31/morgan-565-to-435-in-labors-favour-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozpolitics.info/?p=1174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Report here.
Graphs here.
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Report <a href="http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2008/4331/">here</a>.</p>
<p>Graphs <a href="http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/elections/fed2010/the-polls/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/31/morgan-565-to-435-in-labors-favour-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newspoll: 54 to 46 in Labor&#8217;s favour</title>
		<link>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/28/newspoll-54-to-46-in-labors-favour-3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/28/newspoll-54-to-46-in-labors-favour-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Newspoll]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozpolitics.info/?p=1166</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Today&#8217;s Australian reported on the latest Newspoll. There are a couple of interesting features worth noting. First, like the recent Nielsen poll, the attitudinals have really bounced for the Prime Minister on the back of his handling of the global financial crisis.

Second, unlike the recent Nielsen poll which translated the attitudinal bounce into a [...] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Today&#8217;s <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24562165-17301,00.html">Australian</a> reported on the latest <a href="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/newspoll28oct.pdf">Newspoll</a>. There are a couple of interesting features worth noting. First, like the recent <a href="http://www.ozpolitics.info/blog/2008/10/20/acnielsen-56-to-44-in-labors-favour-2/">Nielsen poll</a>, the attitudinals have really bounced for the Prime Minister on the back of his handling of the global financial crisis.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="/election2010/newspoll-sat-pm.png" alt="Newspoll: Satisfaction with the Prime Minister"/></p>
<p>Second, unlike the recent Nielsen poll which translated the attitudinal bounce into a voting bounce, the Labor vote under Newspoll is continuing its slow slide. But Labor voters need not worry too much. While no longer stratospheric, Newspoll has Labor in a commanding position.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="/election2010/pollchart-tpp.png" alt="Labor's two party preferred vote share" /></p>
<p>The usual graphs can be found <a href="http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/elections/fed2010/the-polls/">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/28/newspoll-54-to-46-in-labors-favour-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPI</title>
		<link>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/25/cpi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/25/cpi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 07:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Psephology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ozpolitics.info/?p=1159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  The state of the economy plays a critical role in forming voter preferences. Earlier this week the ABS released its Consumer Price Inflation (CPI) statistics for the September quarter 2008. Inflation is one of the key variables in the Sawford formula, which is used by some psephologists to predict election outcomes.

The Producer Price Inflation [...] ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The state of the economy plays a critical role in forming voter preferences. Earlier this week the <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/">ABS</a> released its Consumer Price Inflation (CPI) statistics for the September quarter 2008. Inflation is one of the key variables in the <a href="http://www.ozpolitics.info/guide/elections/fed2010/the-sawford-formula/">Sawford formula</a>, which is used by some psephologists to predict election outcomes.</p>
<p align="center"><img src="/election2010/econ-cpi.png" alt="Consumer Price Inflation: year-ended percentage change" /></p>
<p>The <a href="http://rba.gov.au/Statistics/Bulletin/G03hist.xls">Producer Price Inflation (PPI) statistics</a> for the September quarter, also released by the ABS this week, were the highest since the series commenced in 1998.  The PPI at the final stage of production jumped by 2.0 per cent in the September quarter for an annual rate of 5.6 per cent. The PPI is used by the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) to monitor upstream inflationary pressures. These PPI figures suggest the CPI figures for the December quarter will also be high.</p>
<p>Statistics on the Australian economy can be sourced easily from the RBA&#8217;s <a href="http://rba.gov.au/Statistics/">statistics page</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ozpolitics.info/2008/10/25/cpi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
