Senate round up
With the exception of Victoria, the Australian Electoral Commission has finished the Senate counting. The results (post 1 July 2005) look like:
| Coalition | Labor | Greens | Family First | Democrats | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSW | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vic | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Qld | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SA | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| WA | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Tas | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| ACT | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| NT | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Newly elected | 21 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Continuing | 18 | 12 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Total | 39 | 28 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
So how did the pundits perform?
My performance was poor. My first prediction, assuming the Coalition got a majority in the House, was (plus or minus two for the Coalition, Labor and the Greens)
| Coalition | Labor | Greens | Family First | Democrats | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 37 | 29 | 6 | 0 | 4 |
So not exactly what I predicted, but within the error margins I gave myself. However, my second prediction, made once the voting tickets had been published, was off the mark. I underestimated the Coalition’s performance and overestimated the Greens.
| Coalition | Labor | Greens | Family First | Democrats | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | 32-38 | 26-30 | 4-9 | 0-3 | 4 |
| Likely total | 37 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
Malcolm Mackerras performed much the same as I did.
| Coalition | Labor | Greens | Family First | Democrats | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 37 | 29 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
Charles Richardson from Crikey performed even poorer.
| Coalition | Labor | Greens | Family First | Democrats | Ind. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 35 | 26 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
You would have to say no-one anticipated the scale of the Coalition victory in the Senate.